« MAMMA MIA ROBERTO ALAGNA! | Main | OC Breaks it Down as "Decreto Bondi" Becomes a Law, and the Reform of Italian Opera Houses is on the Way (World Does Not End!) »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c83e69e20133f1f21389970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Breaking: Italian Senate Passes New Law, Reform of Italian Opera Houses Is On The Way:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
They will strike all the time now!!!
Posted by: Piccola Nelly | June 29, 2010 at 07:48 PM
if they strike all the time, they're right.
it's not a a law, it's not a reform. it's just a shame. and bondi is the worst minister of the culture in italian history.
the Fondo unico per lo spettacolo was 250 milion euros two years ago. next year it will be about 140 milion euros...aren't they right to protest dear opera chic and friends?
Posted by: francesco | June 29, 2010 at 08:56 PM
No Francesco, Italian opera houses (la Scala is the exception) do in average 50 shows every year. They need to work more and protest less, they are living with Italian tax payers money and work very little. Work more, protest less. Easy. Then you can ask for more money. In this situation, more money to "enti lirici" is more more wasted.
Posted by: Stefano | June 29, 2010 at 09:02 PM
Sorry, but I read the website and still couldn0t figure out what has been approved.
"No Francesco, Italian opera houses (la Scala is the exception) do in average 50 shows every year."
Is it about increasing the nr. of shows? The statistics had actually shown rather nice numbers.
Explanation would be appreciated.
--B
Posted by: Bruno | June 29, 2010 at 09:34 PM
@stefano
this is not the right way...
next year they won't have money to pay the singers. i have some friends who work in the theatre. they told me the risk (now it's not a risk, it's sure) is that a lot of theatres will cancel some productions. i am an architect. i can tell you that an ancient theatre is very very expencive. so millions euros every year are necessary only to entertain structures. what can we do? maybe tell sfondrini or piermarini that their way of building was not good for the 21st century? come on! i say to my dear italians: just turn off the television and turn on the brain!
Posted by: francesco | June 29, 2010 at 09:42 PM
Isn't Italy's government in danger of going broke in the Greek fashion? If so, "austerity" will come one way or another, and I imagine that the fate of the opera houses is pretty far down on the list of the government's concerns, given that they need to worry about paying pensions, etc.
Posted by: Ken | June 29, 2010 at 10:27 PM
I'm just going to Italy. Am I doomed?
Posted by: Barbara | June 29, 2010 at 10:38 PM
In the US, it would be time for a TELETHON! Opera telethon! Cool idea, only you can call it a national GALA if you want. If you are going to work more, might as well be in the area of fund raising for opera.
Posted by: Lou Ann D. | June 30, 2010 at 05:31 AM
Maybe they'll all wake up now!
Maybe they'll all start working as they should instead of sending in doctor's certificates!
They are the ones who ruined themselves.
They had a good thing going for them and, as usual for Italians, totally mucked it up!
Posted by: walter | June 30, 2010 at 07:35 AM
Do you judge it normal to strike against Parliament?
Posted by: gigio | June 30, 2010 at 10:14 AM
American opera companies are constantly in fund raising mode.
Posted by: Barbara | June 30, 2010 at 01:37 PM
140 million euros is enough if the unions stop asking for too much as they have done until now.
Why should a singer or conductor be paid 160,000 euro for a night's work? No matter how good one is, getting so much money is unfair. No one deserves such an amount!
They must stop complaining, and think that 160,000 euro is a hundred people's salaries!
Posted by: Nathan | July 01, 2010 at 10:17 PM