Since 2007 it has shaken audiences in Berlin, Vienna, Aix-en-Provence, Amsterdam, and New York. Now three years later, Da una casa di morti comes to Milan's La Scala. Leoš Janáček's opera based on Dostoyevsky's writings about hope and transcendence in a Siberian Gulag will open tomorrow night in Patrice Chéreau's epic production (costumière Caroline De Vivaise; set designer & Chéreau-collaborator since their 1979 Bayreuth Ring, Richard Peduzzi; and choreographer Thierry Thiue Niang). Pierre Boulez was the man with the plan, conducting performances prior to NYC, but now Esa-Pekka Salonen is all over it. Since Scala has only seen it once on stage in over 40 years, this weekend it's been a media deluge with articles in Corriere della Sera, La Repubblica, Vivimilano, and La Stampa. Opera Chic covered it extensively when it premiered at the Metropolitan Opera this past fall, but will sooooo be there tomorrow night.
Chéreau said to Vivimilano: "It's an opera rich with energy and vitality that's reflected in Janáček's music. There aren't true protagonists, rather, many characters. The protagonist is the society that the detainees have formed, with their trauma there are also moments of beauty. The prisoners are relatively free. They eat, drink, sleep, think, love, hate, rebel, mess around, play, walk, and act..."
To Corriere: "Behind the work of Janáček is Alban Berg's Wozzeck. The Czech composer had heard it three years prior to writing From the House of the Dead and remained transfixed by the work." Of Peduzzi's scenery: "With the movable walls, I wanted to synthesize the feeling of a prison. Like a box, huge and encompassing, or small and oppressive. Walls and walls, not a single breath of air and no sky."
To La Stampa Chéreau said that after this production finishes at La Scala, he's done with opera. In his future it will be more cinema and theater, searching always for a new audience, a new challenge, and as always, a new experiment. Spoken like a real philosopher.
Why is it that directors of other media think that Opera is just like theatre or film? Why can't they see the possibilities in this unique art form? WHy always the irritation and the feeling of constriction from a director, who often even doesn't like to listen to music? Why the feeling of need to tell another (or several) story on top of the one already existing? It's not a joke anymore.. Operasingers have been joking about "german directing" for decades but it exists everywhere, not only germany. And at the same time; Felstenstein! OK, sometimes very formulaic, but his work was a craft! This can be developed, this is something that can reach the core of the art form.
Posted by: Mgunda Eilosoleko | February 28, 2010 at 12:37 PM
@Mgunda Eilosoleko: What to say? My grandmother used to say "Ma quante mosse!"
The problem is that no matter how hard they ALL try to change it or ignore it, it's STILL opera and opera it will remain! Thank goodness!
Will they ever learn?
Posted by: walter | February 28, 2010 at 04:11 PM
Enjoy tomorrow!
It is absolutely fantastic...
Posted by: Tim | February 28, 2010 at 09:47 PM
Corriere is sadly wrong. Janacek never heard WOZZECK complete. While the 1926 Prague premiere of the work was certainly a cause celèbre, and the Moravian composer defended Berg's work, he never actually went to any of the performances. Janacek only heard three extracts from Berg's opera in a concert in Brno (when Janacek's own Sinfonietta was given its first Brno performance). There are links to be made, but nothing as direct as suggested by Corriere.
Posted by: Gavin Plumley | February 28, 2010 at 10:35 PM